Articles Tagged with dissolution doctrine

New York highlighted, Mizrahi v. Cohen equitable buyoutKey Takeaways:

  • New York gives an oppressed LLC member no oppression statute. LLC Law § 702 is the sole route to judicial dissolution, and the courts apply it more strictly than the corporate oppression standard — exclusion from management, unpaid distributions, and member discord do not, by themselves, state a claim.
  • The two grounds that survive are failed purpose and financial infeasibility, both measured against the operating agreement. Facts that fit those prongs win; freeze-out facts dressed up as dissolution claims get dismissed at the pleading stage.

Tile map of U.S. states comparing LLC minority oppression remedies by state: dissolution-only jurisdictions versus statutory oppression remedies Key Takeaways:

  • Not every state gives an oppressed LLC member a statutory remedy. New York and Delaware confine judicial dissolution to the strict “not reasonably practicable” standard; New Jersey’s LLC statute expressly authorizes relief for oppression, and that power cannot be waived in the operating agreement.
  • In the gap states, freeze-out conduct alone rarely wins dissolution. The realistic paths are fiduciary duty claims — which produce damages, not exit — and, in New York, a court-fashioned buyout available only after a dissolution claim succeeds.
Contact Information